There would have definitely been many more American troops lost if the bombs were not dropped, but I do not agree that it justifies killing innocent men, women, and children on such a large scale. However, with the Soviet Union and the United States working together, Japan would most likely be defeated in a short amount of time, making the atomic assaults on Japan even more unnecessary.
Yet another reason that Truman and his cabinet decided to attack is that American relations with the Soviet Union during that time were becoming strained.
Walker, 9 Truman also explained by dropping the atomic bomb it prevent the United States from having to invade Japan and loosing more and more of our soldiers. I postulate that to annihilate an entire city of people in one fell swoop is something that neither man nor nation should be able to decide, even if they conceive the other party to be deserving of such a punishment in retribution for their actions.
Walker, 75 It saved a lot of American lives but by doing this killed a lot of innocent lives. It is understandable that the American government would want to appease the American public, secure relations with the Soviet Union, justify the expense of developing the bomb, and reduce the cost of American lives, however; the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was horrendous and morally detestable.
The atomic bomb was the answer to not risking our solders lives and sending them to there death. The other side stated that the bombings were unjustified and inhumane to show off American Military force for the one purpose of intimidating the Soviet Union.
However, there has been no proof provided that Truman received any information that an invasion on Japan would cause that number of casualties Samuel Walker 5 pages words This is a preview content. The first side stated that the bombings were militarily necessary for ending the war.
Walker, 12 In the book the author does not pick one side but agrees and disagrees on both yes and no. The sheer volume of innocent lives lost due to the bombs, as well as the agony caused by the radioactive material, was most assuredly not justified.
And yes, the bomb was necessary to save the lives of American troops, perhaps numbering in the several thousands. In addition to the desire to end the war and thus the casualties to the American troops, Truman had other reasons for considering the approval of the atomic attacks.
Regardless of the option to partner with the Soviet Union, the United States decided to act alone in their attacks. The desire for amicable relations with the Soviet Union was a factor in the conclusion to use the bombs against Japan Truman and the use of atomic bombs against Japan.
Stimson in a meeting on April 25, on the capability of the bomb, and the enormous expense incurred in developing it. It is logical to conclude that any leader would be concerned with the sacrifice of life affecting their country; however, abiding by moral principles must also be considered.
But no, the bomb was probably not necessary to end the war within a fairly short time without an invasion of Japan. In addition to all of the reasons the American government had for dropping the bombs on Japan, they came to the conclusion that there were not any viable reasons presented against doing the atomic assaults which outweighed the reasons in favour of dropping them.
In view of the evidence now available, the answer is yes. Walker had always been intrigued by the history surrounding the decision to assail Japan with the use of the atomic bombs. A premier membership is required to view the full essay.
Also, if he had not employed the use of the atomic bomb, he would not be able to justify to the American people why he had chosen not to do so, as there were so many American lives lost. Truman was enlightened by Secretary of War Henry L.
However, there were other options for the American government to proceed with in order to secure a victory. Walker, Truman explained one of the reasons for him dropping the atomic bomb was to have the war end faster. At the time, the Soviet Union was preparing to declare war against Japan, and joining them or preceding them in the war would apparently strengthen the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States.Prompt and Utter Destruction: An analytical review Was the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the American Government unavoidably necessary?
This is what Samuel J. Walker intends to uncover in his publication. Prompt and Utter Destruction: An Analytic Review Rebecca Torres Hist / 04/14/ Prof. Stromberg Prompt and Utter Destruction: An analytical review Was the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the American Government unavoidably necessary?
The author's ability to cover the most important issues with economy, together with a thorough bibliographical essay at the end, make this an excellent addition to the literature, particularly useful for beginning students.
In This Review. Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan. By J. Samuel. Related Documents: Analysis of Prompt and Utter Destruction Essay Essay on Threat of Gradual Destruction Emma Ayala Period 1 November 27, Unsound Argument Mr.
Ventimiglia Threat of Gradual Destruction The greatest threat to society is not drugs, promiscuity, or violence. Prompt & Utter Destruction Essay By Anthony Green Walker, J. Samuel. Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs against Japan.
Essay about Prompt and Utter Destruction Prompt and Utter Destruction War is the greatest tragedy of human existence. There has been war on planet Earth as long as civilizations existed.Download